Obviously, "Green-Power" choices and lobbyists are owned by corporate, anti-green, "profit-at-any-cost", criminals. How much stock do you own in "Wind-Power" companies, or how much money are you paid to endorse their "Wind-Power"?
Wind-power is not an environmentally friendly source of energy. Wind-energy is pollution. Wind-energy is land consuming, resource consuming and dangerous for living things. Solar energy is the only logical green power source, even though solar energy is also being implemented unwisely.
Currently, people blindly accept a power source just because it is labeled "green", no matter how ugly, poorly implemented, counter productive, and costly it is. Such as electric cars, wind power and hydrogen power. Solar power is the obvious answer to humanities need for green energy, and all our resources should be used to produce this clean energy source.
Back in the 1970's scientists created a solar, earth starlight that could supply all the energy needs of earth. What happened to this idea?
generally under capitalism most commercial acivity including solar power which you like, as well as wind power which you don't like, is owned on a profit basis. So I don't understand your distinction here. As it happens I don't own any shares at all in wind power companies. Neither do I get paid by any of them. The only shares I do own, in fact are in a solar pv cooperative company
Good reminder. also - the prices bid by projects could be quite lower than the ceiling under the UK auctions...
Obviously, "Green-Power" choices and lobbyists are owned by corporate, anti-green, "profit-at-any-cost", criminals. How much stock do you own in "Wind-Power" companies, or how much money are you paid to endorse their "Wind-Power"?
Wind-power is not an environmentally friendly source of energy. Wind-energy is pollution. Wind-energy is land consuming, resource consuming and dangerous for living things. Solar energy is the only logical green power source, even though solar energy is also being implemented unwisely.
Currently, people blindly accept a power source just because it is labeled "green", no matter how ugly, poorly implemented, counter productive, and costly it is. Such as electric cars, wind power and hydrogen power. Solar power is the obvious answer to humanities need for green energy, and all our resources should be used to produce this clean energy source.
Back in the 1970's scientists created a solar, earth starlight that could supply all the energy needs of earth. What happened to this idea?
generally under capitalism most commercial acivity including solar power which you like, as well as wind power which you don't like, is owned on a profit basis. So I don't understand your distinction here. As it happens I don't own any shares at all in wind power companies. Neither do I get paid by any of them. The only shares I do own, in fact are in a solar pv cooperative company